U.S. Supreme Court clarifies, blurs scope of FCA liability

By Jaclyn Jaeger2016-06-28T08:30:00

A new ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court offers some clarity as to when a company can face liability under the False Claims Act, but does it also blur the lines? Jaclyn Jaeger has more.

THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT

SINGLE MEMBERSHIP CORPORATE MEMBERSHIP

You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.

If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.

Article
The Escobar decision, one year later

2017-06-20T14:30:00Z By Jaclyn Jaeger

A year after the Supreme Court more closely defined materiality and implied consent in False Claims Act cases, compliance officers still have more questions than answers.
Article
Preventing False Claims Act liability

2017-05-16T13:45:00Z By Jaclyn Jaeger

During a recent panel, federal and state officials, corporate defense attorneys, and whistleblower reps alike debated the ins and outs of U.S. FCA cases and how to defend them.
Blog
False Claims Act penalties to double

2016-06-30T09:45:00Z By Jaclyn Jaeger

Federal contractors, beware: False Claims Act penalties will nearly double, effective Aug. 1. The increase in penalties is especially relevant to healthcare providers, government contractors and others that conduct business with the government. Jaclyn Jaeger has more.

“For tracking litigation, enforcement, and regulatory developments, Compliance Weekshould be your prime source.”

U.S. Supreme Court clarifies, blurs scope of FCA liability

THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT

Related articles

The Escobar decision, one year later

Preventing False Claims Act liability

False Claims Act penalties to double

“For tracking litigation, enforcement, and regulatory developments, Compliance Week
should be your prime source.”