- Chief Compliance Officer and VP of Legal Affairs, Arrow Electronics
By 
Kyle Brasseur2023-08-01T15:57:00
Broker-dealers complying with anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) requirements put forward by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) must be mindful of the resources they are providing for their programs during the current heightened risk environment.
The SEC’s Division of Examinations released a risk alert Monday in which it said it found some registrants “did not appear to devote sufficient resources, including staffing, to AML compliance given the volume and risks of their business.” The division cited increasing sanctions being imposed by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) as a growing risk that could exacerbate deficiencies, most notably at firms where the same personnel perform AML and sanctions compliance functions.
The risk alert also noted implementation deficiencies regarding AML policies, procedures, and internal controls.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT. To continue reading, choose one of the options below.
News and analysis for the well-informed compliance or audit exec. Select an option and click continue.
Annual Membership $499 Value offer
Full price one year membership with auto-renewal.
Membership $599
One-year only, no auto-renewal.
The Securities and Exchange Commission wants broker-dealers and certain clearing agencies to know the expectations for the reduction of the settlement cycle for national and international trades from two business days after the trade date to one day.
New York-based investment adviser HG Vora Capital Management agreed to pay $950,000 to settle charges levied by the Securities and Exchange Commission alleging failure to report beneficial ownership regarding its stake at trucking transport company Ryder System.
How the Securities and Exchange Commission determines which investment advisers to inspect and what areas those examinations typically cover were among subjects addressed in a new risk alert released by agency staff.
When the DOJ released its revised Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs, it turned some heads. Tucked into a section on risk assessments was a strongly worded series of questions that appeared to shoulder compliance teams with the responsibility for ensuring the safe use of AI tools by their firms.
The Department of Justice’s Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs has made the importance of artificial intelligence governance frameworks clear, but it didn’t say what role compliance should play. Here’s the answer.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network issued an alert to financial institutions about their obligations to report deepfakes, warning artificial intelligence has given bad actors additional tools in their arsenal.
