- Chief Compliance Officer and VP of Legal Affairs, Arrow Electronics
By 
Aaron Nicodemus2022-09-07T19:02:00
U.S.-based audit firms seeking new public company clients in China should ensure they have full access to previous audits and work papers before taking the job or risk potential enforcement, the acting chief accountant at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) warned.
Paul Munter said in a statement Tuesday that Chinese companies should not believe swapping out a China- or Hong Kong-based auditor for a U.S.-based firm will result in quick compliance with the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (HFCAA). The U.S. firms in that scenario must similarly understand their responsibilities under standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).
The HFCAA, signed into law in 2020, would delist any public company that does not meet U.S. audit inspection standards after three consecutive years of noncompliance. The SEC has identified approximately 200 Chinese companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges that face delisting.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT. To continue reading, choose one of the options below.
News and analysis for the well-informed compliance or audit exec. Select an option and click continue.
Annual Membership $499 Value offer
Full price one year membership with auto-renewal.
Membership $599
One-year only, no auto-renewal.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board found seven of eight audit engagements it reviewed in China and Hong Kong contained “unacceptable rates” of deficiencies.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board announced it received “complete access to inspect and investigate” audit firms in China and Hong Kong, potentially averting the delisting of hundreds of Chinese public companies from U.S. exchanges.
The Chinese affiliate of Big Four audit firm Deloitte agreed to pay a $20 million penalty and undertake extensive remedial measures as part of a settlement with the SEC for audit failures that included asking clients to conduct their own audit work.
Breaches of the EU’s ground-breaking GDPR can cost companies substantial sums and huge reputational damage. Now some are warning that the implementation of the EU’s AI Act, the first phase of which begins in February 2025, will be just as far-reaching, and could potentially lead to similar numbers of cases. ...
Any product that uses AI needs to be safety assessed for its entire lifespan under new rules that went into effect recently across the EU. Experts warned companies using AI to tailor products could be classed as “manufacturers” and face the same duty of care as developed.
When lawmakers slam the U.K.’s chief financial regulator as “incompetent,” it not only opens the doors for others to pile criticism on it, but it sparks a debate about how the organization can be improved–or removed.
