- Chief Compliance Officer and VP of Legal Affairs, Arrow Electronics
By 
Aaron Nicodemus2022-08-29T15:34:00
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) amended its rules to provide further incentives to whistleblowers, particularly in cases involving large payouts or multiple federal agencies.
The final rule, which will become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, allows the commission to increase the dollar amount of an award but removes its authority to decrease it, according to an SEC fact sheet. The current rule provides whistleblowers with 10-30 percent of monetary sanctions collected in any enforcement action over $1 million for which the whistleblower provided relevant and timely information to help investigators make a case.
In 2020, the Republican-led SEC under former Chair Jay Clayton amended its whistleblower rules to potentially limit large payouts. In February, current SEC Chair Gary Gensler indicated the agency under Democratic control would seek to unwind those changes.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT. To continue reading, choose one of the options below.
News and analysis for the well-informed compliance or audit exec.
Annual Membership best value
Subscribe now for $365
Our lowest price ($1 per day) for one year.
Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) revived a whistleblower protection bill aimed at shielding whistleblowers from retaliation and cutting down on the time it takes to receive an award from the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Peiter Zatko, a former cybersecurity executive at Twitter, has blown the whistle on his observations of systemic data security lapses at the company, undercounting of fake accounts, and how the social media platform could be manipulated by foreign intelligence services.
A federal appeals court has denied the whistleblower claims of a former Royal Bank of Scotland employee seeking compensation for a tip he said generated more than $10 billion worth of settlements.
The U.S. Supreme Court extended the statute of limitations for businesses attempting to challenge some federal regulations, allowing regulated entities a longer timeline to appeal a decision.
The Supreme Court of the United States overturned a long-held precedent in which courts deferred to federal agencies in interpreting complex or ambiguous regulations–a decision that could make thousands of federal regulations more vulnerable to legal challenges.
Financial institutions would be required to conduct more thorough risk assessments on their anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism programs under a new rule proposed by the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
