SCOTUS extends timeline for regulated entities seeking to overturn regulations
By 
Aaron Nicodemus2024-07-02T19:43:00
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) extended the statute of limitations for businesses attempting to challenge some federal regulations, allowing regulated entities a longer timeline to appeal a decision.
In a 6-3 decision, issued Monday, SCOTUS opened the door to legal challenges to regulations long after those regulations take effect.
The case, Corner Post v. the Federal Reserve Board, centered on a challenge by a North Dakota truck stop that sued over a Fed regulation related to fees that merchants must pay banks for handling debit card transactions. The fee took effect in 2011; Corner Post did not open until 2018.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
PremiumSCOTUS overturns Chevron doctrine, putting thousands of regulations in limbo
The Supreme Court of the United States overturned a long-held precedent in which courts deferred to federal agencies in interpreting complex or ambiguous regulations–a decision that could make thousands of federal regulations more vulnerable to legal challenges.
-
PremiumSCOTUS decision upends in-house tribunals in SEC fraud cases
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s practice of using in-house tribunals overseen by an administrative judge to adjudicate securities fraud cases is unconstitutional.
-
News BriefSCOTUS reaffirms whistleblower protections in ruling against UBS
The Supreme Court reaffirmed whistleblower protections guaranteed under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in a unanimous decision expected to set a precedent that impacts all corporate internal reporting cases.
More from Regulatory Policy
-
ArticleEU prioritizes AI regulation and frameworks, despite Omnibus delays
The EU announced delays to some of its landmark AI regulations in its Digital Omnibus in December, but the AI Act has not gone away. Compliance leaders must beware complacency and ensure they follow the debate and note new deadlines as they emerge.
-
ArticleBank of England tightens liquidity requirements for U.K. banks
U.K. banks must reassess how quickly they could monetize their assets in the event of a crisis under new rules proposed by the Bank of England’s regulatory body, the Prudential Regulation Authority. The proposals are the first changes to the liquidity rules since these were updated in the aftermath of ...
-
ArticleEurope’s groundbreaking crypto rules put at risk by delays in implementation
Europe may have taken the lead in attempting to regulate cryptoasset firms before any other major jurisdiction, but a year after the ground-breaking rules came into force, it does not necessarily follow that they are robust or that the industry they are meant to hold accountable is embracing them.