- Chief Compliance Officer and VP of Legal Affairs, Arrow Electronics
By 
Kyle Brasseur2024-04-29T20:05:00
A notice of proposed rulemaking to modify the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) Change in Bank Control Act (CBCA) was withdrawn after receiving mixed reviews among the agency’s board of directors.
The draft proposal, put forward Thursday by Rohit Chopra, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, would have restored the FDIC’s role in reviewing certain changes in control by removing a notification exemption in the current rule when the Federal Reserve Board reviews a notice under the CBCA. It would have been open to comment and sought feedback on other issue areas related to the rule.
But the proposal did not advance, after receiving criticism from FDIC Board Vice Chairman Travis Hill and Michael Hsu, the acting head of the Treasury Department’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. FDIC Chairman Martin Gruenberg supported the rule change.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT. To continue reading, choose one of the options below.
News and analysis for the well-informed compliance or audit exec. Select an option and click continue.
Annual Membership $499 Value offer
Full price one year membership with auto-renewal.
Membership $599
One-year only, no auto-renewal.
Federal regulators adopted a notice of proposed rulemaking on incentive-based compensation requiring large banks to make their executive compensation arrangements “more sensitive to risk.”
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Reserve Board, and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency combined to provide guidance on third-party risk management focused on the unique risks faced by community banks in their third-party relationships.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation proposed to strengthen its approach to evaluating bank mergers under the Bank Merger Act, particularly how it would address factors like competition, financial resources, the convenience and needs of communities, financial stability, and money laundering.
Any product that uses AI needs to be safety assessed for its entire lifespan under new rules that went into effect recently across the EU. Experts warned companies using AI to tailor products could be classed as “manufacturers” and face the same duty of care as developed.
When lawmakers slam the U.K.’s chief financial regulator as “incompetent,” it not only opens the doors for others to pile criticism on it, but it sparks a debate about how the organization can be improved–or removed.
The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority apologized to investors in peer-to-peer investment firm Collateral for not acting swiftly enough to prevent Collateral from defrauding its customers.
