FTC ‘click to cancel’ proposal harmful to businesses, companies argue
By 
Adrianne Appel2024-01-17T22:06:00
A proposed “click to cancel” rule by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is not necessary, too broad, and would harm mom-and-pop companies, according to business allies and trade groups.
The business groups, including the Interactive Advertising Bureau and International Franchise Association, made their case against the FTC’s proposed amendments to its negative option rule at an informal hearing by the agency Tuesday. The hearing was held as the FTC prepares to move into final rulemaking on a proposal it says is necessary to halt deception around subscription services.
The proposed changes would modernize the agency’s 50-year-old subscriptions and recurring payments regulations, particularly regarding online purchases, and aim to make it easier for people to cancel subscriptions and be completely informed when they sign up for them.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
ArticleMatch.com agrees to pay $14 million in FTC settlement over subscription practices
Match.com, the online dating site, will pay $14 million and make changes to its membership terms to settle allegations that it made cancellations difficult and made misrepresentations to members, the Federal Trade Commission said Tuesday.
-
News BriefCongress introduces bipartisan Unsubscribe Act after FTC Click-to-Cancel setback
Two senators introduced a bipartisan bill to create new rules for subscription-based businesses, aiming to increase transparency and fairness after a federal judge blocked the Federal Trade Commission’s “click-to-cancel” rule from nearly two years ago.
-
PremiumFTC final ‘Click to Cancel’ Rule requires disclosure of material facts before enrollments
Tthe Federal Trade Commission, after years of public comments and changes, released a final “Click to Cancel” Rule, which requires a customer’s express consent before they can be charged and prohibits practices that make it difficult for a customer–whether a family or another business–to cancel.
More from Regulatory Policy
-
ArticleEmployment law in the age of AI: Compliance considerations
Employment law in the age of AI is evolving faster than many companies can keep pace. As more states enact AI laws and as more case law piles on, chief compliance officers and in-house counsel must ensure that compliance policies and procedures evolve as AI legal and compliance risks evolve.
-
ArticleCompliance must future-proof AI projects to meet evolving regulations
AI implementations are surging, but many new systems are being abandoned after companies have invested in expensive projects. Now evolving AI regulation is adding to the list of reasons why new systems may fail. Compliance must watch emerging regulatory developments and ensure that any new AI tools are capable of ...
-
ArticleSEC gets ball rolling on ending quarterly reporting, as investors urge caution
Disclosure requirements for public companies have ballooned over the decades and need to be reigned in, the three members of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), said Thursday.