By
Jeff Dale2024-03-19T18:48:00
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) fined Chicago-based financial technology company M1 Finance $850,000 as part of a settlement addressing alleged improper use of a social media influencer program.
M1 paid influencers to post promotions that were “not fair and balanced,” thus violating FINRA Rules 2210 and 2010, the self-regulatory organization announced in a press release Monday. The case marks the first of its kind by FINRA regarding violations of social media promotion rules, which were highlighted in targeted firm examinations starting in September 2021.
M1 agreed to a censure and certain remedial measures to comply with FINRA Rule 2210 in reaching settlement.
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
2024-04-29T19:02:00Z By Aaron Nicodemus
Online brokerage services provider TD Ameritrade agreed to pay a $600,000 fine for violations of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority rules over its automated approval system that allegedly allowed inexperienced traders to engage in options trading.
2024-04-15T16:26:00Z By Aaron Nicodemus
A Barclays unit agreed to pay $700,000 to settle allegations levied by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority that its research analysts violated conflict-of-interest rules and the firm failed to sufficiently supervise their trades.
2024-03-27T21:55:00Z By Jeff Dale
Two subsidiaries of Stifel Financial Corp. agreed to pay a collective total of about $2.3 million over alleged violations of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority rules regarding nontraditional exchange-traded products.
2026-02-05T00:55:00Z By Ruth Prickett
Major accountancy firms in France are under investigation for anti-competitive practices. The French competition watchdog embarked on a series of “unannounced inspections” and removed documents relating to audit and reporting on Jan. 13.
2026-02-03T23:22:00Z By Neil Hodge
The European Commission has launched a formal investigation against Elon Musk’s X under the Digital Services Act over fears that its AI tool Grok may be producing and disseminating illegal material.
2026-02-03T22:57:00Z By Adrianne Appel
Three former executives at Archer-Daniels-Midland intentionally misled investors by inflating the performance of the company’s Nutrition unit, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has alleged.
Site powered by Webvision Cloud