- Chief Compliance Officer and VP of Legal Affairs, Arrow Electronics
By 
Neil Hodge2023-09-12T15:00:00
A banking boss’s decision to leak client details to a journalist is likely to cost the industry millions in new compliance checks as U.K. regulators prepare reviews into how banks treat people with extreme political views and whether they are subject to excessive and illegal monitoring.
NatWest’s now-former Group Chief Executive Alison Rose broke the most basic rule on confidentiality and told a BBC reporter that Nigel Farage—the U.K.’s face of Brexit and anti-immigration—had his bank account canceled because he didn’t meet the necessary wealth criteria.
Farage was a customer with Coutts bank, a financial institution that advises account holders be able to borrow at least 1 million pounds (U.S. $1.3 million) or hold £3 million in savings (U.S. $3.8 million) with it. Coutts is part of the NatWest Group.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT. To continue reading, choose one of the options below.
News and analysis for the well-informed compliance or audit exec. Select an option and click continue.
Annual Membership $499 Value offer
Full price one year membership with auto-renewal.
Membership $599
One-year only, no auto-renewal.
Just because Alison Rose received a public apology from the U.K. Information Commissioner’s Office regarding the suggestion she might have violated the General Data Protection Regulation doesn’t mean NatWest could avoid sanction.
An independent review into how NatWest handled the closure of politician Nigel Farage’s Coutts account uncovered potential regulatory breaches by the bank that are on the radar of the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority.
The furor over NatWest Group’s decision to monitor and close the account of right-wing Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage—and then disclose the details to a journalist—has raised questions regarding whether other banks employ the same means to get rid of undesirable customers.
It’s been a long “integrity journey” for Ericsson, according to the company’s Head of Compliance Global Affairs Alison Howell. Since settling with the DOJ over FCPA violations in 2019, the company has gone through a "business critical transformation," resulting in the end of its compliance monitorship.
Whether you’re a multinational telecommunications company looking to certify your anti-corruption program post-settlement, or a biochemical company victimized by a “rogue” employee, seeing the light at the end of the enforcement tunnel isn’t always easy.
The biggest Compliance Fails of 2024 show the real-world consequences of noncompliance for the companies that faltered, but also for their customers and their employees.
