Skip to main content
Skip to navigation

Mandatory Arbitration Agreements May Be an Endangered Species

By Joe Mont2014-04-29T00:00:00

pearson-scott-updated_585485_1

lock icon THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT. To continue reading, choose one of the options below.

Become a Member

News and analysis for the well-informed compliance or audit exec. Select an option and click continue.

Annual Membership $499 Value offer

Full price one year membership with auto-renewal.

Membership $599

One-year only, no auto-renewal.

Access CW Newsletters and CPE webcasts. REGISTER FOR LIMITED FREE ACCESS

Already a Compliance Week member?

Related articles

Article
CFPB courts even more controversy with arbitration rule

2017-07-18T09:30:00Z By Joe Mont

A new rule finalized by the CFPB bans arbitration demands in financial services agreements. A boon to class-action attorneys, questions abound as to what it all means for firms.
Article
Debate over CFPB’s arbitration rule intensifies in comment letters

2016-09-13T12:30:00Z By Joe Mont

The CFPB has received some 13,000 comments in a fierce debate over its proposed rule to limit the use of binding arbitration for resolving disputes associated with financial products. Joe Mont explores.
Article
Seeking to squash mandatory arbitration, CFPB proposal draws praise and venom

2016-05-10T15:45:00Z By Joe Mont

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is moving ahead with a proposed rule that will prohibit mandatory arbitration clauses. While proponents agree with the Bureau’s assertion that class-action lawsuits provide a more effective means for consumers challenging problematic practices, pro-business groups see the rule as a deathblow for financial services arbitration ...