The disclosure landscape is constantly changing, improving, and then changing again—causing public companies to continuously encounter an increasing amount of regulatory requirements for disclosure reporting. While businesses try to keep on top of new regulations and trends, it can be easy to lose sight of an effective Disclosure Management Cycle—particularly when there's no standard cycle in place.

What's more is that software-as-a-service solution providers are popping up in the disclosure management space, promising to make the disclosure cycle more efficient and accurate. While their promises may not be empty, how can businesses be sure which providers will truly help disclosure processes without a proper cycle identified internally?

When it comes to corporate disclosure, how well do we actually know the Disclosure Management Cycle? Does every business follow a standard cycle? More importantly, does a standard cycle exist?

This study will describe a twelve-step Disclosure Management Cycle that businesses can use as a beacon for ensuring they are not only compliant, but also tuned-in to the requirements and needs of regulators, stakeholders, investors, lawyers, accountants, competitors, and more.

What You'll Learn:

Why a Disclosure Management Cycle should define your solution partners— and not the other way around

How and where to account for components of the Disclosure Management Cycle that extend beyond your internal processes

A twelve-step Disclosure Management Cycle that you can implement in your operations today