Experts: Delaware court McDonald’s ruling lowers bar on officer liability
By 
Jaclyn Jaeger2023-03-10T13:30:00
The fiduciary duty of oversight that historically has applied only to directors “applies equally to officers,” including chief compliance officers, the Delaware Court of Chancery explicitly held in a recent ruling.
The Jan. 26 decision by Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster in the case McDonald’s Corporation Stockholder Derivative Litigation means shareholders can proceed to trial with their consolidated derivative lawsuit against David Fairhurst, the fast food chain’s former global chief people officer.
A second shareholder derivative lawsuit filed against McDonald’s current and former board members alleging breach of oversight duty was dismissed by Laster in a separate decision issued March 1. In that decision, Laster found the directors took steps to address the toxic culture.
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
News BriefMcDonald’s avoids SEC fine for misleading statements related to fired CEO
The Securities and Exchange Commission found McDonald’s violated federal securities law when it failed to fully disclose material factors regarding the firing of former Chief Executive Stephen Easterbrook in 2019.
-
ArticleMcDonald’s claws back $105M severance paid to disgraced former CEO
McDonald’s has agreed to drop its lawsuit against disgraced former CEO Steve Easterbrook, who will return more than $105 million in equity and cash he received upon the termination of his employment in 2019.
-
ArticleMcDonald’s handling of ex-CEO scandal gets compliments, criticism
A fresh podcast from the Theranos whistleblower and a new compliance association for Black practitioners get a round of applause from us this week, while a complicated case involving McDonald’s lands the company on both the “Nailed It” and “Failed It” lists.
More from Ethics & Culture
-
PremiumCompliance should be a business partner, not a blocker
Compliance has long been viewed by some as the “Department of No.” What typically happens is a new product or service is being launched, and compliance is brought in at the end of the process. Inevitably, the compliance team finds aspects of the new product or service that violates a ...
-
EventLearn to identify, redirect unethical behavior at summit
A panel at Compliance Week’s Ethics and Compliance Summit will use interactive exercises, real-world case studies, and DOJ guidance to “equip participants with actionable tools to navigate high-pressure environments and build stronger, more human-centered compliance cultures.”
-
PremiumExperts explain why red flags can often be ignored due to ‘underlying systematic issues’
Companies spend huge sums on audit, risk management, and compliance to alert them about potential legal issues before they escalate into serious corporate governance failings. There’s only one problem, however–they often misread their own early warning signs or ignore them altogether.