- Topics
- Regions
- Events
- Webcasts
- Resources
- CW Exclusives
- Membership
“For tracking litigation, enforcement, and regulatory developments, Compliance Week
should be your prime source.”- Chief Compliance Officer and VP of Legal Affairs, Arrow Electronics
Chapter 5: Volkswagen’s path to winning back trust
By 
Aly McDevitt2021-05-20T13:00:00
Volkswagen Group of America Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer Stephanie Davis said halfway through the Dieselgate monitorship, “We are aware of the fear in our culture right now. That is something we are tackling, but it’s not something that fixes overnight.”
Now the monitorship is finished. How does one measure whether fear exists in a workplace culture in continuing recovery?
THIS IS MEMBERS-ONLY CONTENT
You are not logged in and do not have access to members-only content.
If you are already a registered user or a member, SIGN IN now.
Related articles
-
News BriefSEC fines LPL Financial $18M for failed due diligence on new, high-risk accounts
Broker-dealer LPL Financial will pay $18 million to settle charges by the Securities and Exchange Commission that its anti-money laundering program did not properly vet customers and failed to close or restrict thousands of high-risk accounts.
-
News BriefAmex to pay $230M in penalties to resolve charges it deceived customers, banking partner
American Express will pay approximately $230 million in fines and penalties to settle allegations that it deceptively marketed credit card and wire transfer products, and also misrepresented the tax benefits of two payroll wire transfer products.
-
News BriefSEC fines Wells Fargo $35M, Merrill Lynch $25M over improper cash sweeps
Wells Fargo and Merrill Lynch will pay $35 million and $25 million, respectively, to settle allegations by the Securities and Exchange Commission that their handling of investment accounts’ cash sweep programs violated federal law.
More from Case Studies
-
PremiumChapter 4: Investigations into misconduct: What banks can do
Both JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank retained their respective Jeffrey Epstein relationships for too long. Yet, there is a case to be made for why exiting a high-risk relationship too soon can become an inverse form of recklessness.
-
PremiumChapter 3: Egregious failures: Customer due diligence and transaction monitoring
Why did JPMorgan Chase retain Jeffrey Epstein for more than a dozen years? How did the relationship persist despite glaring red flags? The “why” is straightforward; the “how” is more complicated.
-
PremiumChapter 2: KYC shortfalls: JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank’s onboarding of Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein’s designation as a high-risk client should have subjected him to enhanced due diligence that never appeared to occur, most notably at Deutsche Bank. Instead, Epstein was allowed to continue his misconduct despite numerous red flags.